The Sahara let's tell lies
Feb 22, 2024 2:22:59 GMT -8
Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 2:22:59 GMT -8
Know why those grotesque lies that come from our “democratic” politicians, and also non-democratic ones, with which they try to confuse and deceive their electorate, the theoretically sovereign people, evoke that rule in me. What are now called “fakes”. In the case of politicians, they entail, as an added bonus of evil, the breakdown of the loyalty owed by administrators to their subjects, which justifies the democratic system. You know, I'm talking about Trump, Putin and many others. And also, at another level, to our popular politicians, a niche of democratic anti-politics, of lies and corruption or of corruption and lies, the better. Not even Pedro Sánchez escapes that “need” to wrap his most unpopular decisions in cellophane paper, to hide them. Unpopular and democratic, by the way, are antonyms. Behind the lies of politicians, the back room is always the same: the need to deny reality, the concurrence of perverse interests that impose it, the submission by the politician to them and even the awareness of a guilt that is attempted to be justified.
Morally, from enlightened despotism, with “everything for the people, but without the people.” This is in relation to what everyone has described as a political shift in the traditional Spanish position on Western Sahara and which Pedro Sánchez has described as “a step forward” in said policy. No, it's not a euphemism. It's a big lie. After reaching the roundabout, Pedro Sánchez did not continue through the exit that corresponded to the direction he followed before. He has taken the exit corresponding to the direction he came Costa Rica WhatsApp Number from and returns in the opposite direction. He cowardly recoils. Although it is not necessary to specify it as known, the Spanish position on the Sahara was summarized in a single point: the self-determination of the Sahrawi people. In accordance with UN resolutions. That is to say, the future of the Sahara must be decided by the Sahrawis who must choose to integrate into Morocco, integrate into Morocco as an autonomous province, establish themselves as an independent State or any other option they decide to choose.
The new Spanish position omits the formal and material requirement that it must be based on the decision of the Sahrawis whose will is replaced by that of Morocco. In other words, nothing about self-determination. Or if you prefer, “Self-determination, not to begin with.” The change (and fraud) is patent. Support for Polisario comes from principles of democratic ethics 2.- Spain is a parliamentary monarchy. Who did Pedro Sánchez think he was? Surprisingly, the “step forward” that in reality is not, is attributed personally to the President of the Government, who assumes the authorship, but not the responsibility because he lacks the precise courage to recognize the change in its fair terms. That is, he tries to avoid her. More surprisingly, we heard from some minister of the coalition party, that they, dissatisfied with the new policy, cannot be held responsible either “because the direction of foreign policy is the responsibility of the President of the Government.” And this, sorry, is also a fake. Specifying.
Morally, from enlightened despotism, with “everything for the people, but without the people.” This is in relation to what everyone has described as a political shift in the traditional Spanish position on Western Sahara and which Pedro Sánchez has described as “a step forward” in said policy. No, it's not a euphemism. It's a big lie. After reaching the roundabout, Pedro Sánchez did not continue through the exit that corresponded to the direction he followed before. He has taken the exit corresponding to the direction he came Costa Rica WhatsApp Number from and returns in the opposite direction. He cowardly recoils. Although it is not necessary to specify it as known, the Spanish position on the Sahara was summarized in a single point: the self-determination of the Sahrawi people. In accordance with UN resolutions. That is to say, the future of the Sahara must be decided by the Sahrawis who must choose to integrate into Morocco, integrate into Morocco as an autonomous province, establish themselves as an independent State or any other option they decide to choose.
The new Spanish position omits the formal and material requirement that it must be based on the decision of the Sahrawis whose will is replaced by that of Morocco. In other words, nothing about self-determination. Or if you prefer, “Self-determination, not to begin with.” The change (and fraud) is patent. Support for Polisario comes from principles of democratic ethics 2.- Spain is a parliamentary monarchy. Who did Pedro Sánchez think he was? Surprisingly, the “step forward” that in reality is not, is attributed personally to the President of the Government, who assumes the authorship, but not the responsibility because he lacks the precise courage to recognize the change in its fair terms. That is, he tries to avoid her. More surprisingly, we heard from some minister of the coalition party, that they, dissatisfied with the new policy, cannot be held responsible either “because the direction of foreign policy is the responsibility of the President of the Government.” And this, sorry, is also a fake. Specifying.